Defining the Learning Curve for Endoscopic Ear Skills Using a Modular Trainer: A Multi-Institutional Study.

OBJECTIVE: Quantify the learning curve for endoscopic ear skills acquisition in otolaryngology residents using a simulator. The secondary objective was to determine if demographic factors or previous endoscopic experience influenced skill development. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter study. Resident participants each completed 10 amassed trials using a validated endoscopic ear skill trainer. SETTING: Two academic teaching hospitals. SUBJECTS: Otolaryngology residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trial completion times; rate of improvement over time. RESULTS: Thirty-eight residents completed the study, 26 from program A and 12 from program B. Fifteen participants were women and 23 were men. Mean age was 30 years old (range 26 to 34 years). Previous experience with otoendoscopy (B = -16.7, p = 0.005) and sinus endoscopy (B = -23.4, p = 0.001) independently correlated with lower overall trial times. Age, gender, postgraduate year, handedness, interest in otology, and video gaming were not associated with trial times. On multivariate logistic regression, resident completion times improved with trial number, and residents without previous endoscopy experience improved at a faster rate than those with experience ( p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Novice surgeons may acquire basic endoscopic ear experience with self-directed simulation training. The learning curve for transcanal endoscopic ear surgery is comparable to those demonstrated for other otologic surgeries, and specific task competencies can be achieved within 10 trials, suggesting that previous experiences, or lack thereof, may not dictate the ability to acquire new skills. There may be a translational value to previous endoscopic sinus experience on learning transcanal endoscopic ear surgery.

Impact of a postgraduate year one (PGY-1) otolaryngology bootcamp on procedural skill development.

Background: To measure the impact of an intensive eight-week postgraduate year one (PGY-1) otolaryngology bootcamp on the acquisition and retention of otolaryngology residents' procedural skills compared to the traditional method of skill acquisition through clinical exposure. Methods: Residents at our institution were evaluated on their performance of flexible laryngoscopy, suture ligature, and rigid bronchoscopy setup at three time points: pre-bootcamp, one-week post-bootcamp, and one-year post-bootcamp. Video recordings were scored by two blinded faculty reviewers using a multipoint rating system. A control group of rising postgraduate year two (PGY-2) residents who did not participate in bootcamp were recorded performing these same skills. Scores in the three skills were compared between groups via t-tests. The eight-week bootcamp curriculum for PGY-1s was held at the Montefiore Einstein Center for Innovation in Simulation at Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center. The participants were two classes of PGY-1 residents (n=8) at our institution who participated in a bootcamp at the beginning of residency, and one class of rising PGY-2 residents (n=3) who did not participate in a bootcamp (control group). Results: A comparison of pre-bootcamp scores to one-week post-bootcamp scores showed significant improvement in suture ligature ( P<0.05) and rigid bronchoscopy ( P<0.05), but no difference in flexible laryngoscopy ( P=0.54). Suture ligature ( P=0.09) and rigid bronchoscopy ( P=0.25) skills were not significantly different from one-week post-bootcamp to one-year post-bootcamp; however, a significant skill improvement was observed in flexible laryngoscopy ( P<0.05). By June of PGY1 year, the two bootcamp cohorts were similar to controls in all three skills: flexible laryngoscopy ( P=0.05), rigid bronchoscopy ( P=0.26), and suture ligature ( P=0.10). Conclusions: Participation in PGY-1 bootcamp was associated with improved acquisition and short-term retention of basic procedural skills, suggesting that bootcamps can be an effective arena to teach basic skills in otolaryngology. PGY-1 bootcamp is a promising arena for multi-institutional development.

Immune-Mediated Sensorineural Hearing Loss in the Pediatric Population.

A case series with chart review of pediatric patients with immune-mediated sensorineural hearing loss, including sudden sensorineural hearing loss and autoimmune-mediated hearing loss, was performed. Ninety-eight patients with sensorineural hearing loss were reviewed, and 41 patients met the inclusion criteria, which included corticosteroid therapy for a decline in sensorineural hearing. The primary outcome was the corticosteroid response rate: 61% of patients responded. The secondary outcome was a sustained response following multiple courses of corticosteroids for additional hearing loss, which correlated with timely corticosteroid treatment: 57% showed sustained response with multiple treatments, but as anticipated, patients were more likely to respond when treated promptly. Sustained responses fell over time with multiple treatments. These data demonstrate pediatric immune-mediated sensorineural hearing loss is corticosteroid responsive in at a rate similar to their adult counterparts and should be considered for similar treatment approaches.

The Correlation of Clinical Corticosteroid Responsiveness With Expression of IL-6 in Peripheral Blood Immune Cells (PBMC) in Patients With Autoimmune Inner Ear Disease (AIED).

HYPOTHESIS: Autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED) patients will differentially express interleukin (IL)-6 based on corticosteroid responsiveness. BACKGROUND: AIED is characterized by periods of acute sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). In a majority of patients corticosteroid responsiveness is lost over time. The mechanisms that control corticosteroid responsiveness have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: Thirty-five AIED patients and 13 age-matched control subjects were enrolled in this study. Steroid responsive (n = 15) and steroid nonresponsive AIED patients (n = 20) were characterized based on audiometry before and after treatment for acute SNHL. Plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained at the time of acute SNHL to quantify plasma IL-6, soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R), and C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 3 (CCL3). PBMCs were stimulated with dexamethasone and release of soluble IL-6, sIL-6R, and CCL3 protein into conditioned supernatants was measured. Plasma IL-6 was also correlated to serum c-reactive protein (CRP), cardiac CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed in the plasma IL-6 between AIED patients and controls (2.37 versus 2.03 pg/ml, p < 0.01), plasma IL-6, and CCL3 between responders and nonresponders (0.136 versus 3.84 pg/ml, p < 0.005; 30.5 versus 32.4, p < 0.05) and released IL-6 from dexamethasone stimulated PBMC in AIED patients compared with controls (0.54 versus 1.12 pg/ml, p < 0.001). There was a correlation between plasma IL-6 levels of AIED patients to both serum CRP and cardiac CRP (R2 = 0.83, R2 = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: We observed AIED patients, specifically nonresponders expressed greater levels of IL-6. Elevated IL-6 levels in AIED patients correlated with CRP levels, providing a commonly available laboratory test that may aid in rapid clinical decision-making in these patients.